Re: What's wrong with 104's?

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Steve on August 14, 2002 at 13:39:44:

In Reply to: Re: What's wrong with 104's? posted by Kendall Raine on August 14, 2002 at 12:19:59:

They weigh to much and are too negatively buoyant even when empty plus aluminum tanks have better buoyancy traits that are easier to dive, safer because you can config some ditchable lead, 2-AL80 have plenty of gas for the Moody. Is six reasons enough for you?

Steve

Follow Ups:

Re: What's wrong with 104's? Kendall Raine 09:32:38 08/16/02 (10)
- Re: What's wrong with 104's? Steve 13:27:20 08/16/02 (9)
  - huh??? mike 23:46:05 08/16/02 (7)
    - Re: huh??? Steve 12:20:27 08/17/02 (6)
      - Hey, some people i know would barely be neutral with -34# mike 20:58:01 08/18/02 (2)
        
        Re: Hey, some people i know would barely be neutral with -34# Snotty and Indignant 01:02:09 08/19/02 (1)
        
        What happens when you deviate from horizontal trim in your drysuit spotty and inconsistent 23:36:11 08/19/02 (0)
      - Re: huh??? tecdiver 13:17:35 08/17/02 (2)
        
        Re: huh??? Steve 14:16:31 08/17/02 (1)
        
        Sigh...You have not a clue. tecdiver 14:42:31 08/17/02 (0)
  - Re: What's wrong with 104's? Kendall Raine 20:12:03 08/16/02 (0)
Re: What's wrong with 104's? tecdiver...Enough said...nt 14:09:14 08/14/02 (2)
- Re: What's wrong with 104's? Steve 15:46:56 08/14/02 (1)
  - Re: What's wrong with 104's? tecdiver 16:26:53 08/14/02 (0)

Post a Followup