EANx use; is there a controversy ?

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by jeff in landlocked #$%^*+ arizona on July 30, 2004 at 03:31:39:

saw the post about reefseekers & the "accusation" they won't allow other than air....
can someone explain what would be the reasoning behind this? is there a controversy concerning nitrox use ? or is this a "tradition" or some secret thing that ken's shop has ? ken ?
i'd just like to know the reasoning behind it . . . .
thanks in advance

Follow Ups:

Re: EANx use; is there a controversy ? AADIVER 20:55:45 07/31/04 (1)
- now, there's an answer that makes sense..... jeff in landlocked #$%^*+ arizona 21:04:37 07/31/04 (0)
no intent on bashing, but serious question, because jeff in landlocked #$%^*+ arizona 00:31:05 07/31/04 (0)
I wonder why Ken Kurtis hasn't said anything yet... T. Schmidt 13:52:41 07/30/04 (7)
- K K Busioness Decision Statement ptf 15:07:02 07/30/04 (5)
  - Re: K K Busioness Decision Statement Elian 20:54:20 07/30/04 (4)
    - Safer? questionable.... ChrisM 22:37:02 07/30/04 (3)
      - Re: Safer? questionable.... Max Bottomtime 16:37:20 07/31/04 (2)
        
        Re: Safer? questionable.... Elian 19:26:36 07/31/04 (1)
        
        Re: Safer? questionable.... Gosford 09:23:10 08/03/04 (0)
- Ken Kurtis is probably out fishing ptf 14:52:23 07/30/04 (0)
Re: EANx use; is there a controversy ? Elaine 05:58:16 07/30/04 (1)
- Liability issue? jlyle 07:29:04 07/30/04 (0)

Post a Followup