diver.net

Re: love mine, but no contacts





[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ California Scuba Diving BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Anastasia L on December 31, 2006 at 23:38:54:

In Reply to: love mine, but no contacts posted by Roger on December 31, 2006 at 09:41:43:

Ditto.. my husband and I have both been using HydroOptix masks for almost 3 years. The masks have about a -4.5 diopter effect; I normally wear -3.5 contact lenses on land, and my husband -2.5, and our eyes adjust just fine with no lense and the HO masks. In fact, I see better with the "imperfect" correction of the HydroOptix mask than with "perfect" lenses in and a normal flat mask!

The only drawback was that they used to fog something fierce. Over time they've gotten better (or else we've just nailed the hang of cleaning and gel-ing them), plus I think the new versions are made of a slightly different, more fog-resistant material.

Totally worth it if you're nearsighted or willing to wear contacts. Even though people will make fun of your bug-eyes.

Just getting your peripheral vision back underwater is worth any hassle, in my opinion!

Anastasia



Follow Ups:
  • fogging Roger 20:25:50 01/02/07 (0)


Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Message:
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Post Background Color: White     Black
Post Area Page Width: Normal   Full
You must type in the
scrambled text key to
the right.
This is required to
help prevent spam bots
from flooding this BBS.
capcha
Text Key:

      


diver.net