I figured I would have to write this some time. Talk about human races and questions of prejudice,
racism, jingoism all can come up and it all goes down hill from there. The truth is pretty interesting
though and shows a great potential for all the peoples of the world. Still, if the races are different,
someone is sure to ask which is superior, is there a master race? There are actually quite a few
superior races and master races, but be clear on the differences between them and the meanings of
the terms.
Historically, most wealth has come from agriculture, but also sometimes by trade. In Western
Culture, the agriculturists of Sumeria were ruled by the priestly caste that would have
directed planting and organized the harvest. From the time of Sargon The Great's conquest of
Sumeria, Western Culture has traditionally and until quite recently been ruled by hereditary
military castes. These groups provided critical organization to the society. They are often
thought of as parasitic on the society other than that they protect the society from other
ruling castes elsewhere. Sometimes the rule is benevolent, sometimes not, but success of these
groups was always dependant on their ability to organize. These were the Master Races. Very
often they were part of an international caste such of the Ptolemys of Rome and Egypt. They
were Greeks, Eutustrians, Romans, Scandinavians, The Monarchy of Europe and lastly was the
desire of Hitler to actually resurrect the Roman Empire with technological war. It seems
though that the militarists lost their role as master races because of the great equalizer,
the gun. No longer was survival in war dependant on a life time of training. Myself, I say
that if you want a master race, find one that is mild mannered and good at their job, but
for now I think their day is past.
Now Superior Races are far more interesting. I'm limited to looking at the races of Western
Culture but this can be applied to all races. Superior is generally a value judgment and
might be here, but biology and ecology have some definitions of superior. As an example, to
be a successful migrant to a new niche is considered to be superior. Having successfully
reproduced is considered to be superior. Still, that is not directly what I am talking about
here. This is about the tribes that have successfully transitioned to the civil society with
greater disease resistance, greater tolerance of higher density living, greater technical
skills and greater intelligence as judged by their social skills. In Western culture, this
would be the Sumerians (or the three tribes that became the Sumerians), the Semites (who
conquered and then hybridized with them), the Indo-Europeans (Greeks and Romans that defeated
them in turn) and the Celts who hybridized with them and made a great contribution to Western
Culture. Just the fact that these groups successfully hybridized and survived in the cities
defines them as superior. Probably other tribes were selectively absorbed as well, for beauty
or some more subtle but valuable trait.
There are other groups that this evaluation applies to. The tribes that made up the civil
peoples of the Indus Valley, the Yellow River of China and the peoples of Meso America.
All of those races are defined as superior by their survival, their hybridization and their
move into the new niche of agriculture and civil life.
That does not mention the tribes of Africa and Australia that were not in a situation to
create cities and where agriculture is more of a problem due to the insects. They developed
other strategies and potentials.
There are going to be traits found in all kinds of different races that by themselves may
not seem advanced by obvious standards, but their individual traits are special and valuable.
Their potential from hybridization are currently unpredictable.
This thesis says that some off the most valuable traits for humans will include superior
immune systems, a better birth canal design and a stability of psychology. These traits
will have to be considered in the context of hybridization as well, which makes the situation
more complex. The civil peoples have many superior traits, but as humans gain a knowledge of
genetics, there will be a lot of surprises about what is available, what is valuable and who
has it.
One thing about it. If you are alive, it means your ancestors never lost at the evolutionary
game and humans have been playing a tough game for the last few million years as they have
rapidly evolved into the new niche of social intelligence and tool use.
I put this elsewhere, but it is appropriate here.
Consider two people of basically the same race or modern tribe. They are genetically, quite closely related. Call
one of them superior to the other. Name them Bester and Fester respectively. There is very little difference
between them when examined statistically at the genetic level, but there must be critical differences if you
examine the differences between the two individuals. Bester is stronger, faster, healthier, more intelligent and
better looking... superior. Bester has all of the traits and potentials of Fester, many in better forms and even
some traits that Fester does not have. Fester is completely genetically related
to Bester, but Bester is not completely related to Fester. Bester is not so much different from Fester, but is
Fester plus. This is the additive nature of evolution. So if the game is played as genetic survival, sometimes Fester could best insure his genetic survival by promoting Besters success. Is it an issue of genetic continuity or genetic survival and is related to family and inclusive fitness.
This is now supposed to include my observations as well as a theoretical background. Unfortunately I have little familiarity with short term hybrids and little to make comparisons to long term Western hybrids. I have seen that almost any Saxon hybrid is usually quite intelligent though.
Eurasian women tend to be beautiful.
I am familiar with one long term Saxon / Asian hybrid that probably went back to the time of the Mongols. The person was incredibly intelligent. Academically, they basically had no competition or devotion either. For all their intellect, as expected, they were most recognizable emotionally.
Just speaking in terms of health, beauty and brains, a race descended best traits of the tribes of the West, Asia, India and Africa is going to be very different from anything we are familiar with at present. The potentials from just what is available now, are amazing.
I don't generally mention it, but I am very good at recognizing individual charactersitics of different tribes. In this case I am referring to integral trats. These are traits that are fully functional, usually in a homozygous situation, but sometimes hybrids. They are so special that they are easily recognizable if you learn how.